Loading
Pulling inspections, violations, and complaints.
Home › UT › Sandy › KinderCare - Sandy
License #F10-3660 · Center · Child Care Center
Not published by the state. Owners can add hours via profile claim.
When they operate
Schedule type not published.
Ages served
Ages not published.
Complaint outcomes are not published by Utah OCC.
Tap a row to expand inspection details, findings, and the state record.
This follow-up inspection · non on-site inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-11 by finding that a staff member failed to provide active supervision. Specifically, the staff member did not know the number of children in their care and was not positioned to ensure each child in the assigned group was actively supervised.
Formal actions published by Utah OCC (corrective action plans, suspensions, revocations, fines, and similar orders). These are separate from routine closed/expired license statuses.
Leave your email if you want a note when this facility's license or enforcement status changes.
Data synced from Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Child Care on Jul 14, 2026 · Source records · Report an error
This announced · annual inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This follow-up inspection · non on-site inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-11(1)(g) by not ensuring that caregivers provide and maintain active supervision by remaining aware of the entire group of children. In the outdoor area, the caregiver was not remaining aware of the entire group of children.
This follow-up inspection · non on-site inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The licensee was out of compliance with R381-100-12(5)(a) by failing to ensure that interactions with the children do not include any action that produces physical pain or discomfort. During an inspection, the licensor identified that a caregiver had an inappropriate interaction with one child by holding the child down by their arms and yelling at the child, resulting in the child's screaming and crying, and a second child by grabbing them and pushing them to the ground for putting soap on a water fountain.
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-7(9)(c) by not ensuring that caregivers complete the preservice training offered by the department before caring for children. At the time of the inspection, there was a caregiver who had not completed preservice training and had been caring for children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on April 19, 2024 and October 1, 2024.
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This non on-site inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring a prescription medication was stored in the original pharmacy container. In the facility, there was an epi pen with no original pharmacy container. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that guests do not have unsupervised contact with any child in care. At the facility, there was a guest who had unsupervised contact with children in care.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that caregivers complete the preservice training offered by the department before caring for children. At the time of the inspection, there were 7 caregivers who were providing caregiving duties and had not completed preservice training. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having incomplete children's records. At the time of the inspection, a child's admission and health assessment forms had not been reviewed, updated, and signed or initialed at least annually. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This non on-site inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having plastic bags accessible to children younger than five years old. In the Pre-k classroom bathroom, there were plastic garbage bags accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having incomplete children's records. At the time of the inspection, a child's admission and health assessment forms had not been reviewed, updated, and signed or initialed at least annually. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
This follow-up · additional follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This non on-site inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having incomplete children's records. In the facility, the admission and health form was not reviewed, signed and updated annually for 2 children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having plastic bags accessible to children. In the Infants classroom there were empty plastic bags in a drawer accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having incomplete children's records. In the facility, two children admission and health assessment forms had not been reviewed, updated, and signed or initialed by a parent, within the last year. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than 3 years old. in the infants, in the 2's and in 2-5 classroom there were chocking hazards accessible. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having accessible safety hazards. In the infants and toddlers classroom, there were empty trash bags accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by exceeding the number of allowed children in a mixed age group and not separating any single-age group that reaches their maximum group size from the mix. In the Discovery Preschool B Room, the number of children exceeded the caregiver-to-child ratio.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the parent of a child completed the admission and health assessment form before being admitted into the program. At the facility, there were two children who did not have a completed health assessment form. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.