Loading
Pulling inspections, violations, and complaints.
Home › UT › Salt Lake City › St. John's CCDC- Sugarhouse
License #F20-78220 · Center · Child Care Center
Not published by the state. Owners can add hours via profile claim.
When they operate
Schedule type not published.
Ages served
Ages not published.
Complaint outcomes are not published by Utah OCC.
Tap a row to expand inspection details, findings, and the state record.
This investigation inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
Formal actions published by Utah OCC (corrective action plans, suspensions, revocations, fines, and similar orders). These are separate from routine closed/expired license statuses.
Leave your email if you want a note when this facility's license or enforcement status changes.
Data synced from Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Child Care on Jul 14, 2026 · Source records · Report an error
This announced · annual inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This unannounced · annual inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This follow-up · additional follow-up inspection · follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-9(18) by not ensuring the fence enclosing the outdoor area is at least four feet high. In the east play area, a part of the fence did not measure four feet high from the ground. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on April 4, 2025.
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-24(22)(b)-(c) by not documenting each toddler's diaper change each day within the hour. In the Crickets classroom, there were diaper changes that had not been documented. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on December 18, 2023.
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-13(7) by having plastic bags large enough to fit a child's head accessible to children younger than five years old. In the bathroom of the Crickets classroom, there were plastic garbage bags accessible to children.
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-9(18) by not ensuring the fence enclosing the outdoor area is at least four feet high. In the east play area, a part of the fence did not measure four feet high from the ground.
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not protecting children from conduct that endangers the children in care. At the facility, during school transportation, a child was left at their school when the van driver did not follow the center's transportation procedure.
This non on-site inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not supplying the vehicle with the required first aid supplies. In a bus used for transporting children, there were no tweezers. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having incomplete children's records. At the time of the inspection, 3 children's admission and health assessment forms had not been reviewed, updated, and signed or initialed at least annually. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
This follow-up · additional follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having an infant sleeping in equipment not designed for sleep. In the Honeybee classroom, there was an infant sleeping in a swing.
This announced · annual inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having medications accessible below 48 inches. In the Caterpillars classroom, essential oils were found in a drawer accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not having the children's admission and health assessment reviewed, signed and updated by the parents within the last year. At the facility, there was an admission and health assessment form not reviewed, updated and signed annually. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.