Loading
Pulling inspections, violations, and complaints.
Home › UT › Kaysville › Time for Families, Davis County
License #F11-29462 · Center · Child Care Center
Not published by the state. Owners can add hours via profile claim.
When they operate
Schedule type not published.
Ages served
Ages not published.
Complaint outcomes are not published by Utah OCC.
Tap a row to expand inspection details, findings, and the state record.
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This unannounced · annual inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
Formal actions published by Utah OCC (corrective action plans, suspensions, revocations, fines, and similar orders). These are separate from routine closed/expired license statuses.
Leave your email if you want a note when this facility's license or enforcement status changes.
Data synced from Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Child Care on Jul 14, 2026 · Source records · Report an error
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-19(14)(a) by not ensuring that protective cushioning met the required depth or thickness determined by the highest designated play surface. In the 3 and above playground, the average depth of the shredded tire did not meet the required depth.
The Licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by not reporting a critical incident to the Office within one business day. During review of critical incidents it was identified that the incident occurred on 05/12/2025 and was not reported until 05/15/2025.
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This non on-site inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having toxic or hazardous chemicals accessible to children. In the infant room, there was dish soap by the sink accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having an empty plastic bag large enough for a child's head to fit inside accessible to children younger than 5 years of age. In the pre-k room, there was an empty plastic bag accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having prescription medications without the original labels or pharmacy containers. At the facility, there were 3 prescription medications that did not have the original labels or pharmacy containers. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
This non on-site inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having prescription medication without the original label or pharmacy container. At the facility, there was a prescription medication that did not have the original label or pharmacy container. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having an empty plastic bag large enough for a child's head to fit inside accessible to children younger than 5 years of age. In the pre-k room, there was an empty plastic bag accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having a sharp object that could puncture skin accessible to children. In the preschool room and pre-k room, there were adult scissors accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
This follow-up inspection inspection recorded no violations or advisories.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that prescription medication provided by parents had the original or pharmacy container and original label with it. In the 4 and older room, the prescription medication for one child did not have the original label with it. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that choking hazards were inaccessible to children younger than three years old. In the three year old room, where there was a two year old, there were small plastic animals in a sensory bin, which were choking hazards, accessible to a child younger than three years old. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.