Loading
Pulling inspections, violations, and complaints.
A closed or expired status means the license is no longer active. Most closures are routine (the business closed or moved) and do not indicate wrongdoing. Confirm the current status on the official state source.
License #DF820403251 · Home-based · Family Home
Not published by the state. Owners can add hours via profile claim.
When they operate
Ages served
Tap a row to expand inspection details, findings, and the state record.
Eva Boyd was providing childcare in a home that was not licensed by the department.
CCSM 2 has not completed training in safe sleep, the recognition of and the reporting of child abuse and neglect, and the prevention of shaken baby, abusive head trauma and child maltreatment. ..........
Asa Eva had that were too. Eva was helping to them. Because o this, there are concerns regarding the children in Evas care.
Disposition: Substantiated
Disposition: Substantiated
Leave your email if you want a note when this facility's license or enforcement status changes.
Generated from this facility's specific inspection record
Data synced from Michigan MiLEAP, Child Care Licensing Bureau on Jul 9, 2026 · Source records · Report an error
Eva Boyd did not permanently reside in the child care home as a member of the household. Eva Boyd was providing care in a home she was not licensed to provide care in.
On 11/02/2022, l completed a telephone interview with the complainant. The complainant alleged at licensee. Eva Boyd was As a result, Eva Boyd . Eva was also a min time. The complainant o knowledge of va Boyd anyone as an adult, nor has the complainant had contact with Eva in several years. However, the complainant is concerned that since Eva Boyd is licensed for foster care and child care, she has the opportunity to children. _ _ explained that Eva Boyd is licensed for foster care under license CF820407739. She is licensed to care for four foster care children. On 10/06/2022, three foster care children, Child A , male), Child B', male) and 3 Child C female) were removed from Ms. Boyd's care due to the allegations. said the children were removed from the foster home, after determining that there was concerning information that was not reviewed prior to Ms. Boyd receiving her foster care licensing. RIChild said she is completing an investigation and she interviewed Child A. B Child C on two separate occasions, however, no concerning information was shared. said Eva will not have any children placed in her care until their investigation is completed. On 1110312022, and I completed an on-site inspection at the child care home located at 41021 Old Michigan Ave. Lot 97 Canton Ml 48188, however, there was no answer to the door. During the conference with I was informed that Ms. Boyd is licensed to provide foster care at 826 MadisonRpsilanti MI 48197. Therefore, we completed an unannounced inspection of the foster care address. When we arrived, there were several children observed in the home alone. Eva and child care staff member (CCSM) 1 arrived at the home, and we interviewed them outside, as Eva would not allow us into the home. She stated that she is packing to move back to her home in Canton Michigan. Eva said that it is, "disgusting that someone would think she is Eva stated that she would never harm a child or child. Eva loves children and became a foster parent and child care provider because she loves children. I Eva has no memory of doing anything when she herself was a -. Eva said she has never been accused of inappropriate contact or care by anyone or any other department. Eva said she attended to address issues she experienced as a child. Eva has not had any other since then. Eva stated that she attended once a week for a month, then every two weeks for a month, then once a month, then every three months, and then finally . Eva provided me with attendance for . The PaenPanWceocuments provided showed that she attended between June 2009 and August 2009. CCSM 1 works as a child care staff member and is an adult household member. CCSM 1 said he does not have any concerns as it relates to Ms. Boyd and does not believe that Eva Boyd would a child. On 1110912022, 1 completed a telephone interview with Child As Mother. Child A's Mother stated that Eva Boyd has provided care for her children since her now year-old son was .years old. Child A's Mother stated that he always loved going o [,I Eva's home. Child A' Mother does not believe that Eva would ever do anything to harm a child or place a child in any danger. On 11/09/2022 and 11/10/2022 I left two voicemails with Witness 1. On 11/09/2022, I completed a telephone interview with Child B's Mother. Child B's Mother does not have any concerns about care or supervision. Child A has been enrolled for about a year. On 11/09/2022 and 11/10/2022 I attempted to contact Child C, Child D, and Child E's parents. Voicemails were left for Child C and Child D's parents. Child E's parents had full voicemails. To date, I have not received a return call.
Based on our findings, investigation, and review, which includes considering the investigation and findings of , the Child Care Licensing Bureau determines Eva Boyd is of responsible character and is suitable and able to meet the needs of children and provide for their care, supervision, and protection. This is insufficient evidence to show that the disposition, temperament, condition, and actions of Ms. Boyd do not promote the safety and well-being of children in a licensed child care setting.
There is no evidence showing that Child A was "spanked" while in care by
There is no evidence showing that Child A took Melatonin while in Ms. Boyd's care.
There is no evidence showing that appropriate care and supervision in not being provided.