Loading
Loading facility…
Pulling inspections, violations, and complaints.
Loading
Pulling inspections, violations, and complaints.
Home › DE › Historic New Castle › Harvest Child & Youth Development Center - New Castle
License #1458667 · Center · Licensed Child Care Center
When they operate
Ages served
Ages not published.
Tap a row to expand inspection details, findings, and the state record.
No inspection records on file.
Formal actions published by Delaware OCCL (corrective action plans, suspensions, revocations, fines, and similar orders). These are separate from routine closed/expired license statuses.
On February 6, 2026, the Office of Child Care Licensing (OCCL) received a complaint regarding allegations of insect infestation, lack of building security procedures to prevent unauthorized access, unsanitary toilet areas, and failing to follow child release policy. An investigation was conducted on February 19, 2026. This complaint is substantiated for lack of security procedures and failing to follow child release policy. Based on interviews, a person was able to access the facility without proper security procedures and Child #1 was released without staff identifying an unknown person. Based on interviews, observations, and documentation reviewed, there is no evidence to substantiate this complaint for insect infestation or unsanitary toilet areas.
Disposition: Substantiated
Between October 1 and October 15, 2025, the Office of Child Care Licensing (OCCL) received five complaints regarding failing to meet the needs of children, not using appropriate behavior supports, incorrect staff-to-child ratios, lack of supervision, keeping an infant in confining equipment for more than 30 minutes, and failing to provide an injury report. The investigation began on October 3, 2025, and ended on October 24, 2025. After interviews and a review of camera footage, this complaint is substantiated for incorrect staff-to-child ratios. The infant classroom was observed on video with one staff member alone with six children on September 30, 2025. The complaint is substantiated for failing to have an understanding of and respect for children and their needs. Administrator #2 was heard on video telling another staff member that picking up a crying infant only makes it worse. An additional concern noted during the investigation was an infant was observed on video asleep in a bouncy seat for more than two hours. While Regulation #78 is not being cited as non-compliant, the time stamp on the video footage documented that Child #1 was in confining equipment (a crib) while awake and crying for exactly 30 minutes before being picked up by a staff member but immediately placed back in the crib. Based on interviews conducted, video, and documents reviewed, there is no evidence to substantiate this complaint for lack of supervision, failing to provide an injury report, or failing to use appropriate behavior supports.
Disposition: Substantiated
On March 28, 2024, the Office of Child Care Licensing (OCCL) received a complaint regarding allegations of not being respectful to a child and their needs. An investigation was conducted on May 2, 2024. This complaint is substantiated because when interviewed, Staff #1 stated to Adult #1 that Child #1, a two-year-old, must dress herself. After Adult #1 responded with concerns about that not being developmentally appropriate, Staff #1 rolled her eyes and ignored the concerns. Staff #1 stated she eventually helped Child #1 with her clothing.
Leave your email if you want a note when this facility's license or enforcement status changes.
Data synced from Delaware Office of Child Care Licensing on Jul 10, 2026 · Source records · Report an error
Disposition: Substantiated
On February 12, 2024, the Office of Child Care Licensing (OCCL) received a complaint regarding staff members beginning work prior to being determined eligible by the Criminal History Unit (CHU), lack of supervision, being out of staff-to-child ratio, having unqualified staff in the classrooms, not following a daily schedule including not providing outdoor play, and overuse of screen time. Additionally, this complaint was received regarding not washing children s bedding weekly, not cleaning and sanitizing the center daily, staff using their cellphones while working with children, no milk being provided during meals, and not all required meal components being offered. An investigation was conducted on February 16, 2024. This complaint is substantiated for staff working before completing a comprehensive background check and being determined eligible by CHU because four staff members present at the visit had not yet been determined eligible. Three of these staff were working before having fingerprints taken. This complaint is also substantiated for lack of supervision because children were observed in the boys bathroom unsupervised. This complaint is substantiated for not providing daily outdoor play because the infant and toddler classrooms were not provided outdoor play as listed on their daily schedule during this visit. This complaint is substantiated for overuse of screen time because more than one staff member interviewed stated over an hour of screen time is provided daily. This complaint is substantiated for staff using cell phones because two staff members were observed using their cell phones during nap time while responsible for caring for children, and one staff member was speaking on their cell phone in a classroom while caring for children. This complaint is also substantiated for not providing the required meal components because chocolate milk was provided to the children for lunch. There is no evidence to substantiate this complaint for not wash ing the nap bedding weekly because of interviews where staff stated the bedding is provided by parents and sent home weekly for cleaning. There is no evidence to substantiate this complaint for not cleaning and sanitizing the center daily because the applicant Raymond Williams and Administrator Letitia Williams stated the center has four contracted staff solely to clean and sanitize the center after closing and staff members stated they clean and sanitize throughout the day. There is no evidence to substantiate children not being served all food components because the menu matched what was being served on the day of this visit and met the requirements. An additional concern noted at the visit was the presence of school-age children in classrooms that were not enrolled in the center, some of the classrooms not having staff members signed out, and two classrooms not having children signed in or out. An additional concern noted at this visit was exceeding the maximum group size in the infant classroom and multiple infant safe sleep violations. During an initial walkthrough, an infant was asleep on a boppy pillow on the floor and another infant was asleep in a crib with a blanket. This was corrected, and then during a second walkthrough, this same infant classroom was over the maximum group size with 10 children present. The infants in the classroom again had blankets and bottles in their cribs. The same infant that was sleeping on the floor earlier in the visit was asleep in a swing with a blanket. Infant bottles were not labeled. The cribs were less than 18 inches apart. An additional concern noted was the use of an air freshener plug-in a classroom.
Disposition: Substantiated