Home VA Suite B Lighthouse Preschool & Daycare

Lighthouse Preschool & Daycare

15154 Carrollton Boulevard, Suite B VA · License #1108323 · Child Day Center

Two Year
Capacity 67 childrenAges 1 mo – 12 yr
Are you the owner of Lighthouse Preschool & Daycare?

Claim this profile to add your website, a description, and keep hours & contact details current.

Sign up to claim

Contact

Director
Ms. Demetria Young
Website
Add via profile claim
Address
15154 Carrollton Boulevard, Suite B VA · Directions
State licensing specialist
Anita Drewry · (757) 404-5261

Hours

Not published by the state. Owners can add hours via profile claim.

Care & schedule

When they operate

Child Day Center

Ages served

1 month - 12 years 11 months
  • Accepts Child Care Subsidy Program
  • Licensed for 67 children
9
Violations, past 3 yrs
From inspections (not complaints)
0
High-risk violations
Serious / high-risk non-compliance
0
Substantiated complaints
Published by Virginia VDOE
14
Inspections, past 3 yrs
Monitoring & assessments

How this facility compares

Violations per inspection, 3-yr
This facility
0.6
Virginia average
0.5

Inspection history & violations

Source: Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Licensing
Unknown — Monitoring Inspection
1 violation cited · view state record
1 violation
  • Violation

    22VAC40-185-340-A · Based on interviews and photographs, the licensee failed to ensure the care, protection and guidance of a child in care.

    Evidence: 1. Staff #1 reported that between the hours of 9:30 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. on April 19, 2021, she took 4 toddlers out to the playground. Staff #1 reported they exited the classroom door that led directly to the fenced play area. Staff #1 stated that she checked the gate latch to ensure it was engaged, per staff #3?s instruction. Multiple staff interviews established that the exit gate on the playground is ?difficult to latch? securely because the latch is loose and interviews as well as photographs confirm that the gate has a gradually increasing ?gap? toward the bottom of the gate. 2. Both staff #1 and staff #2 visually scanned the play area and did not see child #1 (a 20 month old toddler). Staff #2 confirmed via radio that child #1 had not gone back into his classroom, then called the front office to report that a child was missing and immediately ran down the walkway leading from the playground gate, along the side of the center, toward the parking lot. 3. Staff #4 confirmed that she received a radio call to the front office stating that a child was missing and that she instantly ran out toward the parking lot where she saw a member of the public waving her hands and holding child #1. Staff #2 stated that the individual?s car was pulled into the lot with the door still ajar and the turn signal still blinking. Staff #4 stated that child #1 reached for her as she approached but did not appear to be upset. 4. The center?s parking lot is located adjacent to a divided highway with two lanes of travel in each direction and a speed limit of 55 MPH.

    View state record

May 7, 2025 — Monitoring Inspection
No violations cited · view state record
Clean
Nov 4, 2024 — Self-Reported Serious Incident Inspection
No violations cited · view state record
Clean
May 8, 2024 — Monitoring Inspection
1 violation cited · view state record
1 violation
May 8, 2024 — Self-Reported Serious Incident Inspection
No violations cited · view state record
Clean
Nov 8, 2023 — Monitoring Inspection
1 violation cited · view state record
1 violation
  • Violation

    22.1-289.011-F · **** REPEAT VIOLATION****

    Based on observation and interview. the licensee did not ensure that documents required by the Superintendent were posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises. Evidence: The most recently issued violation notice from the previous inspection was not posted conspicuously in the center. The violation notice was located under the Summary page of the Inspection Report and the entire Inspection Report was closed behind a glass display window. The violation notice was not visible. Staff confirmed during the inspection that the violation notice was not visible at the time of the inspection.

    View state record

Aug 28, 2023 — Monitoring Inspection
1 violation cited · view state record
1 violation
Aug 28, 2023 — Complaint-Related Inspection
No violations cited · view state record
Clean
Aug 28, 2023 — Self-Reported Serious Incident Inspection
No violations cited · view state record
Clean
Jun 16, 2023 — Monitoring Inspection
1 violation cited · view state record
1 violation
  • Violation

    8VAC20-780-40-E · ***REPEAT VIOLATION***

    Based on interviews and a review of written policies and procedures, the licensee did not always ensure that the center's activities, services, and facilities were maintained in compliance with the Standards for Licensed Child Day Centers and the center's own policies and procedures that are required by these standards. Evidence: 1. On the afternoon of 6/14/2023, 2 two-year old children were left alone and unsupervised on the playground when staff failed to follow the center?s own written playground safety polices. 2. The center?s written ?SOP for Outside Play? states that ?Staff must complete a name to face every 15 minutes during outside play. Staff must check off children and write the time on the name to face sheet?. 3. When asked if a ?name to face? check was conducted using the written list of children?s names to confirm that all the children were accounted for, staff #1, staff #2 and staff #3 confirmed that they did not call individual children?s names from their name to face sheet and that they did not use that list to look for each individual child. Each of the three staff confirmed that they only counted the total number of children present on the playground and again as they entered the building. 4. The program?s written playground plan states that ?Staff must ensure that any children that join their group are added to the name to face sheet and to their classroom app at all times?. a. Two of the 3 staff caring for child #1 and child #2 on the afternoon of 6/14/2023 recalled that 6 children from their group were taken to the ?pre-tod?s? classroom. The third staff recalled that 2 or 3 children went to the ?pre-tod?s? classroom. b. The ?pre-tod?s name to face sheet did not contain the names of any of the children brought to this room on the afternoon of 6/14/2023, nor did the two and three year old name to face sheets reflect that some children left this group and went to the Pre-tods? classroom on 6/14/2023. c. The final remaining staff present on 6/14/2023 in the front room, where child #1 and child #2 are normally cared for in the afternoon, stated ?I did not know the children were missing until their parents arrived - I thought they were in Tod?s?. 5. The program?s written playground plan states that "There is to be no more than 1 class on the playground? at a time?? Interviews with staff #1, staff #2, and staff #3 confirm that the two-year-old group and the 3- to 4-year-old group were both outside on the large playground at the same time on the afternoon of 6/14/2023. 6. Administrative Staff #5 stated that Staff #1 and Staff #2 ?broke policy?they combined classes and went outside. We do not allow 2 classes on the playground at one time. They did not keep track of these two [children]. They did not complete the required record keeping and they did not follow sight and sound supervision.?

    View state record

Jun 2, 2023 — Complaint-Related Inspection
1 violation cited · view state record
1 violation
Jun 2, 2023 — Self-Reported Serious Incident Inspection
No violations cited · view state record
Clean
Jun 2, 2023 — Monitoring Inspection
No violations cited · view state record
Clean
Jun 2, 2023 — Complaint-Related Inspection
1 violation cited · view state record
1 violation

Questions to ask on your tour

Generated from this facility's specific inspection record

  1. 1The A recent inspection noted: “Evidence: 1. Staff #1 reported that between the hours of 9:30 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. on April 19, 2021, she took 4 toddlers out to the playground. Staff #1 reporte…” — what has changed since then?
  2. 2The May 8, 2024 inspection noted: “Evidence: Five children's records were reviewed. The record for child #1 contained an immunization record which was not signed (or stamped) by a physician, his…” — what has changed since then?
  3. 3The Nov 8, 2023 inspection noted: “Based on observation and interview. the licensee did not ensure that documents required by the Superintendent were posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed…” — what has changed since then?

Data synced from Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Licensing · Source records · Report an error