Home › VA › Hampton › Ms. Sylvia Bennette
Ms. Sylvia Bennette
4830 82nd Street, Hampton VA 23605 · License #990402 · Family Day Home
Contact
- Phone
- (757) 344-3929
- Website
- Add via profile claim
- Address
- 4830 82nd Street, Hampton VA 23605 · Directions
- State licensing specialist
- Tiffany Jones · (757) 403-3045
Hours
Not published by the state. Owners can add hours via profile claim.
Care & schedule
When they operate
Ages served
- Accepts Child Care Subsidy Program
- Licensed for 8 children
How this facility compares
Violations per inspection, 3-yrInspection history & violations
Source: Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Licensing- Violation
22VAC40-111-100-A · Based on record review of 2 children's records and provider interviews, the provider failed to obtain documentation of a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician prior to a child's attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
Evidence: The record for child #2, (first date of attendance 4-20-2021) did not include a physical available for review during the inspection.
- Violation
22.1-289.011-F · The license and any other documents required shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises. The findings from the most recent inspection, dated 12/19/2025, were not posted in a conspicuous place on the premises.
- Violation
8VAC20-800-70-A · Before the child's first day of attendance, parents shall be provided required information in writing. The parents of Child #3 were not provided in writing complete information to parents related to whether or not there is liability insurance in force on the family day home operation, and provisions of the family day home?s emergency preparedness and response plan. Child has been in care for three months.
- Violation
22.1-289.036-A · The family day home at the time of application did not require all adults living in the home to undergo a background check every five years. Household member #1 did not obtain an updated central registry check (
CPS
- Violation
8VAC20-790-180-A · Each provider and adult household member shall have a current report of Tuberculosis Screening (TB) form, every two years from the date of the first screening. Household member #1 TB screening is overdue by 6 months.
- Violation
8VAC20-790-170-G · The vendor is required to keep a current list of all known allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions in each room or area where children are present. The records for Child #2 and Child #4 have allergies (hay fever and Rocephin) noted by physician and parents. There was no written list of children?s names listing their allergies.
- Violation
8VAC20-800-780-B · Repeat
Based on record review and provider interviews, the provider did not ensure to annually review with the parents required emergency contact information, to ensure the information is correct and obtain the parent's signed acknowledgment of the review. Evidence: The record for Child #2 did not have an updated annual review, the most recent review date was signed on 3-2-2023
- Violation
8VAC20-790-250-F · Based on record review and vendor interviews, the vendor did not ensure to compete all required annual training.
Evidence: Providers record did not include the annual department?s health and safety updated course, as the most recent one was was dated 3-23-2023
- Violation
8VAC20-800-780-B · Based on record review and provider interviews, the provider did not ensure to annually review with the parents required emergency contact information, to ensure the information is correct and obtain the parent's signed acknowledgment of the review.
Evidence: The record for Child #4 had a parents review date signed on 4-20-2021.
- Violation
8VAC20-800-610-A · Based on observation and provider interviews, the provider did not ensue that the use of media such as, but not limited to, television, videos, video games, and computers shall be limited to not more than a total of two hours per day; and limited to programs, tapes, websites, and software that are produced for children or are suitable for children.
Evidence: There were 4 children observed during their rest period and 3 were observed awake and watching television while laying on their cots. The provider confirmed the television program was a daytime soap opera and it had been on for approximately 45 minutes. The age range of children in care was 21 months to age 4.
- Violation
8VAC20-790-180-B · Based on observation and vendor interviews, the vendor did not ensue to maintain a written hard copy record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
Evidence: There were four children observed in care during the inspection and only two children had the arrival time documented.
- Violation
22.1-289.058 · Based on observation and provider interview the licensee did not ensure that each building that houses a child day program that is licensed, that serves preschool-age children, shall be equipped with at least one carbon monoxide detector.
Evidence: Provider confirmed there was no carbon monoxide detector.
- Violation
8VAC20-800-730-D · Based on observation and provider interviews, the provider did not ensue medication for caregivers and household members, shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
Evidence: Two medications, (liquid cold /flu and liquid cold medicine) were observed on the window-sill in the kitchen. The kitchen window-sill was accessible to children in care. Provider indicated a household member had used the medication that morning.
- Violation
8VAC20-790-180-B · Based on observation and vendor interviews, the vendor did not ensue to maintain a written hard copy record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
Evidence: The attendance sheet had 6 children's names listed. There were two children observed in care during the inspection. Only one child's name had the arrival time documented.
Questions to ask on your tour
Generated from this facility's specific inspection record
- 1The A recent inspection noted: “Evidence: The record for child #2, (first date of attendance 4-20-2021) did not include a physical available for review during the inspection.” — what has changed since then?
- 2The Jun 5, 2025 inspection noted: “CPS” — what has changed since then?
- 3The May 13, 2024 inspection noted: “Based on record review and provider interviews, the provider did not ensure to annually review with the parents required emergency contact information, to ensur…” — what has changed since then?
Data synced from Virginia Department of Education, Office of Child Care Licensing · Source records · Report an error