GS 110-91 · Violation

Name of Operation: KIDDIE KARE TOO Facility ID: 84000292 Consultant: STEPHANIE PALMER Operation Type: Center Case Number: Visit Date: 8/21/2025 Number Present: 55 Completed Date: 8/21/2025 Age: From 1 To 5 Total Minutes: 100 Time In: 09:25 AM Time Out: 11:05 AM Time In: Time Out: List to Use: Center Type Of Visit: Routine Unannounced Announced/Unannounced: Unannounced The purpose of this visit was to monitor applicable child care rules during a routine unannounced visit. This facility has a five-star license and the compliance history percentage prior to this visit was 91%. Upon arrival, I was greeted by Ms. Arnessia Funderburk, administrator. I shared the reason for my visit. Ms. Funderburk assisted me with today’s visit. The following were monitored during this visit: supervision, staff/child ratio, safety, adequate/approved space, program records, new staff records, license posted, permit restrictions, discipline and storage of hazardous products and medications. I observed children engaged in outdoor playtime, choice activities, circle time, arrival, handwashing procedures and positive interactions were observed between teacher and students. Medication is not currently administered at this facility. The last sanitation inspection was on 4/11/25 with five (5) demerits and a superior classification. The last fire inspection was conducted on 3/19/25. There were zero(0) new staff members hired since the facility’s last annual compliance visit on 2/24/25. The violations cited during the visit were discussed with Ms. Funderburk and documented in the visit summary. The following violations were observed during the visit: Violation Number Comment Rule 319 Staff/child ratios applicable to a classroom, were not posted in each classroom. In space 2-1, a staff/child ratio sheet was not posted. .0713(a)(10), (c) & (f)(3); .2818(e) 428 A current activity plan was not posted for each group of children for reference. In space 1-2, a current activity plan was not posted. GS 110-91(12); .0508(a) 612 Each child's bed, cot, or 2" mat was not individually assigned and identified. In space 2-2, a mat was not assigned to every child. 15A NCAC 18A .2821(b) & (c) 840 All corrosive agents, pesticides, bleaches, detergents, cleansers, polishes, any product which is under pressure in an aerosol dispenser, and any substance which may be hazardous to a child if ingested, inhaled, or handled were not stored in a locked room or cabinet. In space 1-3, an aerosol can was stored in an unlocked cabinet. .2820(b) Because all violations were corrected during the visit, a compliance letter is not required to be submitted. Technical Assistance/Resources: • During the visit, I shared with Ms. Funderburk that preparation for the new QRIS system will begin soon for providers. I sent an email on 8/12/25 reminding providers about the webinars being held on 8/18 and 8/20, September in-person meetings and one-on-one meetings with child care consultants starting in October. I reviewed the QRIS page on the DCDEE website with Ms. Funderburk and we clicked on various resource pages. • During the visit, I reminded Ms. Funderburk to make sure that the mulch is installed soon. I checked the depth of the surface material during the visit and the facility was not in violation but resurfacing will be needed soon. Please continue to visit DCDEE’s website at https://ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov/ to get the latest updates. If you have any questions or need further assistance, please contact me at 980-867-8005 or via email at Stephanie.palmer@dhhs.nc.gov. Stephanie Palmer Child Care Consultant Regulatory Services Section/DHHS Division of Child Development and Early Education If the operator fails to correct any documented violations within the established time period, the Division of Child Development and Early Education may deny, suspend, terminate, or revoke any permit to operate (10A NCAC 09 .2000). All information in this report has been reviewed with me today.I understand that it is my responsibility to maintaincompliance with applicable NC Child Care Requirements at all times

Open Not marked corrected in the state record

Category: supervision. Open / not marked corrected.

G.S. 110-91 · Violation

Name of Operation: KIDDIE KARE TOO Facility ID: 84000292 Consultant: STEPHANIE PALMER Operation Type: Center Case Number: Visit Date: 2/24/2025 Number Present: 59 Completed Date: 2/24/2025 Age: From 1 To 5 Total Minutes: 240 Time In: 08:55 AM Time Out: 12:55 PM Time In: Time Out: List to Use: Center Type Of Visit: Annual Comp Full Announced/Unannounced: Unannounced The purpose of today’s unannounced visit was to conduct an annual compliance visit. The last annual compliance visit for this facility was conducted on February 21, 2024. The compliance history percentage for the 18-month period is 90%. The facility currently holds a five-star license. Upon arrival, I was greeted by Ms. Arnessia Funderburk, Administrator. I shared the reason for the visit. Ms. Funderburk assisted me with today’s visit. During the walk-through, Ms. Funderburk shared that there are currently no infants enrolled in the program. The Secretary of State’s website was monitored and Albemarle Kidsfirst CDC Inc. is current and active. I used the “Annual Compliance Monitoring Checklist for Child Care Centers” as a monitoring tool during today’s visit. I observed postings, indoor and outdoor spaces, safety and program management. Observations: I observed the children engaged in choice activities, table activities, circle time, breakfast, bathroom and handwashing procedures. Four (4) staff files and eight (8) children’s files were monitored during the visit for compliance with NC Childcare Rules. There were two (2) new staff members hired since the last annual compliance visit. I made updates on the staff and training worksheets provided and initialed where I noted updates. The Emergency Preparedness and Response Plan was reviewed during today’s visit. The cover sheet noted a date of 4/19/23. The administrator shared that she updated the plan on 11/15/24. During the visit, Ms. Funderburk logged into the facility’s EPR Plan and showed me the updated information which was different from the information noted in the hardcopy. She tried to pull up the current date of review and was unable to access it. Also, during the visit, Ms. Funderburk contacted two numbers for customer service but both went to voicemail. Medication is currently administered at this facility. The parent authorization and storage of emergency medication were monitored during today’s visit. Transportation is currently being provided at this facility. The exterior and interior of the van were monitored for compliance with NC Child Care rules. The vehicle, license #TMB6218 has a valid registration through 3/31/25. The insurance provided by Progressive is valid from 3/3/24 through3/3/25. The last sanitation inspection was conducted on 7/17/24 with six (6) demerits and a superior classification. The last fire inspection was conducted on 3/18/24. A copy of the computer-generated visit summary and enrollment worksheet were provided during the visit along with a copy of the “AC Monitoring Checklist for Child Care Centers”. The violations observed during the visit were discussed with Ms. Funderburk and documented in the visit summary. The following violations were observed: Violation Number Comment Rule 721 All equipment and furnishings were not in good repair. The toddler playground had equipment with chipping paint-yellow, blue and red riding toys. G.S. 110-91(6); .0601(b) 1125 Before children were transported, written permission from a parent was not obtained that included when and where the child was to be transported, expected time of departure and arrival, and the transportation provider. The written permission from parents for children being transported was beyond the 12-month period. .1003(i)(j) 1767 The health assessment did not include a vision screening. A file for a NC Pre-K student did not contain a record of a vision screening. .3005 (a)(3) 1768 The health assessment did not include a hearing screening. A file for a NC Pre-K student did not contain record of a hearing screening being completed. .3005 (a)(4) 1899 Health and safety training topics were not included as part of on-going training within five years of completing the previous health and safety training topics. Staff members, K.S. and A.M. did not complete the health and safety trainings as required. .1103(b) All violations documented above must be corrected immediately. A letter of compliance will need to be sent to me stating how each violation was corrected. Include the violation number, statement of compliance, license ID and your signature in the letter. Your compliance letter must be received, via email, before or by March 10, 2025. If needed, send your letter to: Stephanie Palmer PO Box 481335 Charlotte, NC 28269 Technical Assistance/Resources: • During the visit, I reminded Ms. Funderburk that the hold harmless status has been extended for child care facilities until the new QRIS is implemented per Senate Bill 425. • During the visit, I reminded Ms. Funderburk that upon receipt of the facility’s next approved fire inspection report, it needs to be sent to me, via email, within one week of completion per NC Child Care rule .0304 (a). • During the visit, Ms. Funderburk asked for clarification regarding a child’s application. I discussed the requirements with her. Please refer to pages 28-29 of the NC Child care rules, rule .0801. • During the visit, I discussed with Ms Funderburk the need to have updated transportation permission forms for each child being transported. Standing permission can be given for up to 12 months for recurring activities only. Please see pages 36-38 of the NC Child Care Rules for details and reference rules .1003 (i) (j) and .1005. Please continue to visit DCDEE’s website at https://ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov/ to get the latest updates. If you have questions or need further assistance, please contact me at 980-867-8005 or via email at stephanie.palmer@dhhs.nc.gov. Stephanie Palmer Child Care Consultant Regulatory Services Section/DHHS Division of Child Development and Early Education If the operator fails to correct any documented violations within the established time period, the Division of Child Development and Early Education may deny, suspend, terminate, or revoke any permit to operate (10A NCAC 09 .2000). All information in this report has been reviewed with me today.I understand that it is my responsibility to maintaincompliance with applicable NC Child Care Requirements at all times

Open Not marked corrected in the state record

Category: ratio. Open / not marked corrected.

G.S. 110-91 · Violation

Name of Operation: KIDDIE KARE TOO Facility ID: 84000292 Consultant: STEPHANIE PALMER Operation Type: Center Case Number: Visit Date: 2/21/2024 Number Present: 64 Completed Date: 2/21/2024 Age: From 0 To 5 Total Minutes: 235 Time In: 09:05 AM Time Out: 01:00 PM Time In: Time Out: List to Use: Center Type Of Visit: Annual Comp w/Rated Lic Assess Announced/Unannounced: Unannounced The purpose of today’s unannounced visit was to conduct an annual compliance and rated license visit. This visit will be the first annual compliance visit for this facility since the change of ownership, effective March 1, 2023. The compliance history percentage for the 18-month period is 90%. The facility currently holds a five-star license. Upon arrival, I was greeted by Ms. Arnessia Funderburk, Administrator. I shared the reason for the visit. Ms. Funderburk assisted me with today’s visit. The Secretary of State’s website was monitored and Albemarle Kidsfirst CDC Inc. is current and active. I used the “Annual Compliance Monitoring Checklist for Child Care Centers” as a monitoring tool during today’s visit. I observed postings, indoor and outdoor spaces, safety and program management. Observations: I observed the children engaged in choice activities, outdoor play time, music, circle time and the individual needs of the infants were being met by the teacher. The NC Pre-K Plan system was monitored prior to today’s visit. The facility’s NC Pre-K staff is active. The site monitoring tool was reviewed as well. The classrooms were monitored on 10-11-23 by the site administrator and documents reviewed on 12-12-23 by the contract agency during an onsite visit. The facility's EPR Plan was reviewed and had been updated on 4/19/23. Six (6) staff files and ten (10) children’s files were monitored during the visit for compliance with NC Childcare Rules. The file review included new staff as well as NC Pre-K students. Medication is currently administered at this facility. Diaper creams and paste were monitored along with the parent permission forms. Transportation is provided at this facility. The exterior and interior of the vehicles were monitored. The registration is valid through 3/31/25 and the insurance covered by Progressive is valid from 3/3/24 through 3/3/25. The last sanitation inspection was conducted on 10/2/23 with eight (8) demerits and a superior classification. The last fire inspection was conducted on 3/21/23. A copy of the computer-generated visit summary and enrollment worksheet were provided during the visit along with a copy of the “AC Monitoring Checklist for Child Care Centers”. The violations observed during the visit were discussed with Ms. Funderburk and documented in the visit summary. The following violations were observed: Violation Number Comment Rule 721 All equipment and furnishings were not in good repair. On the preschool playground, the blue metal tunnel had chipping paint. G.S. 110-91(6); .0601(b) 1052 Staff required to receive on-going training had not completed the required number of hours according to their education and experience. Staff member, K.B. did not complete all of the required on-going training hours. Four(4) hours are needed. .1103(a) 1324 Signed and dated statement by parent that discipline policy received and explained at enrollment was not in child's file. A child's file did not contain the parent's signed acknowledgement of receipt of the discipline policy. .1804(c) All violations documented above must be corrected immediately. A letter of compliance will need to be sent to me stating how each violation was corrected. Include the violation number, statement of compliance, license ID and your signature in the letter. Your compliance letter must be received, via email, by March 6, 2024. If needed, send your letter to: Stephanie Palmer PO Box 481335 Charlotte, NC 28269 Rated License Status: The facility’s application for reassessment was originally received on 1/29/24 and resubmitted on 2/12/24 with updated information. The quality point form was received on 2/12/24. This facility is in cohort #1 and currently in the prep year of the rated license process. This facility’s ERS assessments were conducted on 1/11/24. The average score for the ECERS-R assessment was 6 points and the average score for the ITERS-R assessment was 4.07 points. The overall average score for the two assessments was 5.04 points. The facility’s owner and administrator have opted to use the current points earned during the prep year to complete the rated license reassessment. Program Standards- 6 points (enhanced space, enhanced ratio and ERS=5.0 average and no classroom lower than 4.0) Quality Point- 1 point (75% of teachers have an AAS or higher in early childhood education or child development) Education Standards- pending (child care consultant reviewed WORKS on 2/16/24 and some staff members have not been evaluated in WORKS due to paperwork not submitted by staff members). The next step in the Rated License process will be to complete the Education Standards worksheets once the required information is received. Once all requirements have been met, including corrections of today’s cited violations, the rated license paperwork will be submitted to my supervisor for approval. Upon approval, the rated license process will be completed and a new permit will be issued to you. Technical Assistance/Resources: • During the visit, I reminded Ms. Funderburk to email the fire inspection report to me within one week after the approved fire inspection report is received. Please continue to visit DCDEE’s website at https://ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov/ to get the latest updates. If you have questions or need further assistance, please contact me at 980-867-8005 or via email at stephanie.palmer@dhhs.nc.gov. Stephanie Palmer Child Care Consultant Regulatory Services Section/DHHS Division of Child Development and Early Education If the operator fails to correct any documented violations within the established time period, the Division of Child Development and Early Education may deny, suspend, terminate, or revoke any permit to operate (10A NCAC 09 .2000). All information in this report has been reviewed with me today.I understand that it is my responsibility to maintaincompliance with applicable NC Child Care Requirements at all times

Open Not marked corrected in the state record

Category: supervision. Open / not marked corrected.

10A NCAC 09 .0601 · Violation

Name of Operation: KIDDIE KARE TOO Facility ID: 84000292 Consultant: STEPHANIE PALMER Operation Type: Center Case Number: Visit Date: 1/29/2024 Number Present: 69 Completed Date: 1/29/2024 Age: From 0 To 5 Total Minutes: 125 Time In: 09:30 AM Time Out: 11:35 AM Time In: Time Out: List to Use: Center Type Of Visit: ERS Announced/Unannounced: Announced The purpose of today’s announced visit was to review the results of the ERS assessments conducted on 1/11/24. Upon arrival, I was greeted by Ms. Arnessia Funderburk, administrator. I reiterated the reason for the visit. I conducted a walk-through of the facility. I monitored the playgrounds with specific emphasis on areas addressed in the assessment reports. The following was reviewed during the visit: One (1) ECERS-R assessment summary report, an ITERS-R assessment summary report, program standards worksheet, quality point form and staff information worksheet. The NC Pre-K 1 classroom received a score of 6.0 on the ECERS-R and the One classroom received a score of 4.07 on the ITERS-R. I reviewed the summary reports with Ms. Funderburk during the visit. We discussed the items that scored less than 3 points. ECERS-R- 6.0 Item 7- Indicator: 3.2 (see pages: 18-19 in the ECERS-R) 2 pts Outdoors, the mulch underneath the hanging triangles measured 3 inches deep, rather than at least 6 inches deep. Refer to the document, NCRLAP's Requirements for Gross Motor Space and Equipment, for more information. During the visit, I observed that mulch was installed to meet the requirement. Item 14- Indicator: 3.1 (see pages: 32-33 in the ECERS-R) 2 pts There were no safety concerns indoors. Outdoors, the safety concern mentioned in item 7 applies here as well. Also, there were open "S" hooks on the hanging triangles. Please see NCRLAP's Requirements for Gross Motor Space and Equipment for more information. During the visit, I observed the S hooks and one of the triangles could be easily removed. The director shared with staff that the equipment cannot be used by the children until further notice. ITERS-R – 4.07 Item 6-Indicator: 3.4 (see pages: 18-19 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts Information about the child's health or safety was not shared during the three observed Arrivals. I discussed with the director regarding staff training and working with the infant/toddler specialist. She shared that they do work with an infant/toddler specialist every Wednesday but that staff had only been employed one month at the time of the assessment. Item 7- Indicator: 1.4 (see pages: 20-21 in the ITERS-R) 1 pt During lunch, a child walked around the classroom while eating an apple slice and another child walked around while eating spaghetti noodles. We discussed the safety concerns with this observation and the director shared that she has discussed the report findings with staff involved in the assessment. Item 8- Indicator: 3.2 (see pages: 22-23 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts There were mats near the fine motor materials that were spaced 19 inches apart, rather than at least 36 inches. There were also mats in the block area that were spaced 22 inches apart. The director shared that the mats are normally 36 inches apart with no barrier, but on the day of the assessment, the facility had water damage and could not place mats as normal. The director shared this information with the assessor. The director is not questioning the score. Item 9- Indicator: 3.4 (see pages: 24-25 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts After a child was placed on the changing surface, a teacher stepped away from the area to remove the step from the sink behind her and then placed the step above the counter against the wall. During this time, the teacher was away from the child who was left on the changing surface with her back turned to the child. The director shared that she addressed this concern with the staff member. Item 10- Indicator: 3.1 (see pages: 26-27 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts None of the mouthed items were removed from the play areas before they were handled by other children. Some of these materials included pretend foods, balls, a yellow snap bead, and a gray spoon. Again, I discussed training of new staff with the director. Item 13- Indicator: 3.1 (see pages: 32-33 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts A child cried frequently and for long periods of time throughout the observation. As the child cried, the teachers sometimes responded by telling him that he was a big boy and he had to stop crying. The child was also told that he was an actor, that his crying was not nice, and that the teacher did not love it when he cried. There were also instances when this child and other children who cried were not acknowledged by the teachers as they completed tasks with other children in the classroom and outside. The observed responses to children's crying and the instances when children's crying was not acknowledged prevented this indicator from earning credit. Again, I discussed the concern with this observation and the director shared that she met with the staff member. Item 14- Indicator: 3.2 (see page: 34 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts The spines had become separated from the books, "Fuzzy Bee 123," "My First Songs," and "1000 First Words." The books, "Pooh's Five Little Honeypots," and "Baby Talk" had broken spines and "Miracles of Jesus" had torn pages. Item 17- Indicator: 3.2 (see page: 38 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts The concern with the glitter mentioned in item 11 applies here as well. I discussed with the director regarding the use of age appropriate materials. Item 21- Indicator: 1.1 (see page: 42 in the ITERS-R) 1 pt The teacher reported that sand or water play is not offered to the children who were 18 months and older. The director shared that sand or water play tables are used outside on the toddler playground. Item 27- Indicator: 3.2 (see page: 48 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts As mentioned previously, there were times when teachers did not respond with sympathy when a child cried frequently throughout the observation. There were also times when children cried without responses from the teachers. During the visit, I discussed the importance of addressing these concerns with staff and ensuring that this was no longer occurring through staff and classroom observations. The director shared that she does conduct staff observations. Violation Number Comment Rule 807 A safe indoor and outdoor environment was not provided for the children. On the preschool playground, the triangular handle bars were attached with "S" hooks that were not secure. One triangular hand grip easily separated from the bar. 10A NCAC 09 .0601(a) Compliance History: You must maintain at least 75% compliance history for each 18 month period as required by G.S. 110-90 (4) (c). Please note that any violations cited during future visits will negatively impact your compliance history. Repeated violations or violations left unresolved may lead to an administrative action. Prior to today’s visit, this facility’s compliance history percentage for the 18-month period was 91%. Rated License Status: The next step will be for the facility’s administrator and/or owners to decide if the scores from the prep year assessments conducted on 1/11/24 will be used for the rated license assessment during their reassessment year of 7/1/24-6/30/25. The annual compliance month for this facility is February. During this visit, I discussed with Ms. Funderburk the details of the rated license process and shared that she could let me know during the AC visit or prior to whether or not the prep year assessment scores will be used. I reminded Ms. Funderburk that the facility is still in a hold harmless state and the decision to move forward is voluntary. During the visit, I provided a staff information sheet quality point form and rated license application. A hard copy of the facility’s ERS assessment results. Technical Assistance: • During the visit, I recommended to Ms. Funderburk that the facility work with an infant/toddler specialist. She shared that they have been working with one since August, but that staff changes have occurred and there are new staff members in the young toddler classroom. • During the visit, I recommended to Ms. Funderburk that the S hooks be changed out for a more secure method of attaching the triangular handles if they plan to continue allowing the children to use the equipment. A more secure method is needed to prevent possible fall injuries. Please continue to visit DCDEE’s website at https://ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov/ to get the latest updates. If you have questions or need further assistance, please contact me at 980-867-8005 or via email at stephanie.palmer@dhhs.nc.gov. Stephanie Palmer Child Care Consultant Regulatory Services Section/DHHS Division of Child Development and Early Education If the operator fails to correct any documented violations within the established time period, the Division of Child Development and Early Education may deny, suspend, terminate, or revoke any permit to operate (10A NCAC 09 .2000). All information in this report has been reviewed with me today.I understand that it is my responsibility to maintaincompliance with applicable NC Child Care Requirements at all times

Open Not marked corrected in the state record

Category: ratio. Open / not marked corrected.

G.S. 110-90 · Violation

Name of Operation: KIDDIE KARE TOO Facility ID: 84000292 Consultant: STEPHANIE PALMER Operation Type: Center Case Number: Visit Date: 1/29/2024 Number Present: 69 Completed Date: 1/29/2024 Age: From 0 To 5 Total Minutes: 125 Time In: 09:30 AM Time Out: 11:35 AM Time In: Time Out: List to Use: Center Type Of Visit: ERS Announced/Unannounced: Announced The purpose of today’s announced visit was to review the results of the ERS assessments conducted on 1/11/24. Upon arrival, I was greeted by Ms. Arnessia Funderburk, administrator. I reiterated the reason for the visit. I conducted a walk-through of the facility. I monitored the playgrounds with specific emphasis on areas addressed in the assessment reports. The following was reviewed during the visit: One (1) ECERS-R assessment summary report, an ITERS-R assessment summary report, program standards worksheet, quality point form and staff information worksheet. The NC Pre-K 1 classroom received a score of 6.0 on the ECERS-R and the One classroom received a score of 4.07 on the ITERS-R. I reviewed the summary reports with Ms. Funderburk during the visit. We discussed the items that scored less than 3 points. ECERS-R- 6.0 Item 7- Indicator: 3.2 (see pages: 18-19 in the ECERS-R) 2 pts Outdoors, the mulch underneath the hanging triangles measured 3 inches deep, rather than at least 6 inches deep. Refer to the document, NCRLAP's Requirements for Gross Motor Space and Equipment, for more information. During the visit, I observed that mulch was installed to meet the requirement. Item 14- Indicator: 3.1 (see pages: 32-33 in the ECERS-R) 2 pts There were no safety concerns indoors. Outdoors, the safety concern mentioned in item 7 applies here as well. Also, there were open "S" hooks on the hanging triangles. Please see NCRLAP's Requirements for Gross Motor Space and Equipment for more information. During the visit, I observed the S hooks and one of the triangles could be easily removed. The director shared with staff that the equipment cannot be used by the children until further notice. ITERS-R – 4.07 Item 6-Indicator: 3.4 (see pages: 18-19 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts Information about the child's health or safety was not shared during the three observed Arrivals. I discussed with the director regarding staff training and working with the infant/toddler specialist. She shared that they do work with an infant/toddler specialist every Wednesday but that staff had only been employed one month at the time of the assessment. Item 7- Indicator: 1.4 (see pages: 20-21 in the ITERS-R) 1 pt During lunch, a child walked around the classroom while eating an apple slice and another child walked around while eating spaghetti noodles. We discussed the safety concerns with this observation and the director shared that she has discussed the report findings with staff involved in the assessment. Item 8- Indicator: 3.2 (see pages: 22-23 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts There were mats near the fine motor materials that were spaced 19 inches apart, rather than at least 36 inches. There were also mats in the block area that were spaced 22 inches apart. The director shared that the mats are normally 36 inches apart with no barrier, but on the day of the assessment, the facility had water damage and could not place mats as normal. The director shared this information with the assessor. The director is not questioning the score. Item 9- Indicator: 3.4 (see pages: 24-25 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts After a child was placed on the changing surface, a teacher stepped away from the area to remove the step from the sink behind her and then placed the step above the counter against the wall. During this time, the teacher was away from the child who was left on the changing surface with her back turned to the child. The director shared that she addressed this concern with the staff member. Item 10- Indicator: 3.1 (see pages: 26-27 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts None of the mouthed items were removed from the play areas before they were handled by other children. Some of these materials included pretend foods, balls, a yellow snap bead, and a gray spoon. Again, I discussed training of new staff with the director. Item 13- Indicator: 3.1 (see pages: 32-33 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts A child cried frequently and for long periods of time throughout the observation. As the child cried, the teachers sometimes responded by telling him that he was a big boy and he had to stop crying. The child was also told that he was an actor, that his crying was not nice, and that the teacher did not love it when he cried. There were also instances when this child and other children who cried were not acknowledged by the teachers as they completed tasks with other children in the classroom and outside. The observed responses to children's crying and the instances when children's crying was not acknowledged prevented this indicator from earning credit. Again, I discussed the concern with this observation and the director shared that she met with the staff member. Item 14- Indicator: 3.2 (see page: 34 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts The spines had become separated from the books, "Fuzzy Bee 123," "My First Songs," and "1000 First Words." The books, "Pooh's Five Little Honeypots," and "Baby Talk" had broken spines and "Miracles of Jesus" had torn pages. Item 17- Indicator: 3.2 (see page: 38 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts The concern with the glitter mentioned in item 11 applies here as well. I discussed with the director regarding the use of age appropriate materials. Item 21- Indicator: 1.1 (see page: 42 in the ITERS-R) 1 pt The teacher reported that sand or water play is not offered to the children who were 18 months and older. The director shared that sand or water play tables are used outside on the toddler playground. Item 27- Indicator: 3.2 (see page: 48 in the ITERS-R) 2 pts As mentioned previously, there were times when teachers did not respond with sympathy when a child cried frequently throughout the observation. There were also times when children cried without responses from the teachers. During the visit, I discussed the importance of addressing these concerns with staff and ensuring that this was no longer occurring through staff and classroom observations. The director shared that she does conduct staff observations. Violation Number Comment Rule 807 A safe indoor and outdoor environment was not provided for the children. On the preschool playground, the triangular handle bars were attached with "S" hooks that were not secure. One triangular hand grip easily separated from the bar. 10A NCAC 09 .0601(a) Compliance History: You must maintain at least 75% compliance history for each 18 month period as required by G.S. 110-90 (4) (c). Please note that any violations cited during future visits will negatively impact your compliance history. Repeated violations or violations left unresolved may lead to an administrative action. Prior to today’s visit, this facility’s compliance history percentage for the 18-month period was 91%. Rated License Status: The next step will be for the facility’s administrator and/or owners to decide if the scores from the prep year assessments conducted on 1/11/24 will be used for the rated license assessment during their reassessment year of 7/1/24-6/30/25. The annual compliance month for this facility is February. During this visit, I discussed with Ms. Funderburk the details of the rated license process and shared that she could let me know during the AC visit or prior to whether or not the prep year assessment scores will be used. I reminded Ms. Funderburk that the facility is still in a hold harmless state and the decision to move forward is voluntary. During the visit, I provided a staff information sheet quality point form and rated license application. A hard copy of the facility’s ERS assessment results. Technical Assistance: • During the visit, I recommended to Ms. Funderburk that the facility work with an infant/toddler specialist. She shared that they have been working with one since August, but that staff changes have occurred and there are new staff members in the young toddler classroom. • During the visit, I recommended to Ms. Funderburk that the S hooks be changed out for a more secure method of attaching the triangular handles if they plan to continue allowing the children to use the equipment. A more secure method is needed to prevent possible fall injuries. Please continue to visit DCDEE’s website at https://ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov/ to get the latest updates. If you have questions or need further assistance, please contact me at 980-867-8005 or via email at stephanie.palmer@dhhs.nc.gov. Stephanie Palmer Child Care Consultant Regulatory Services Section/DHHS Division of Child Development and Early Education If the operator fails to correct any documented violations within the established time period, the Division of Child Development and Early Education may deny, suspend, terminate, or revoke any permit to operate (10A NCAC 09 .2000). All information in this report has been reviewed with me today.I understand that it is my responsibility to maintaincompliance with applicable NC Child Care Requirements at all times

10A NCAC 09 .0605 · Violation

Name of Operation: KIDDIE KARE TOO Facility ID: 84000292 Consultant: RASHEKA WHEELER Operation Type: Center Case Number: 0723-028L Visit Date: 7/13/2023 Number Present: 53 Completed Date: 7/13/2023 Age: From 1 To 12 Total Minutes: 65 Time In: 09:50 AM Time Out: 10:55 AM Time In: Time Out: List to Use: Center Type Of Visit: Complaint Visit Announced/Unannounced: Unannounced The purpose of today’s unannounced visit was to investigate the allegations in the following complaint report: case #0723-028L. According to the Reporter, There are concerns that: The playground mulch is less than the required depth. Currently there is no one on staff who has received the required playground safety training. Some areas of fencing in the playground area are in need of repair. Upon arrival to the facility, I greeted the administrator and stated the purpose of today’s visit. I conducted a walk-through of the facility with the administrator, Arnessia Funderburk. During this visit, the indoor spaces and outdoor used by the children were observed. Children were observed participating in free choice play on the outdoor environment designated for each of the age groups. Complaint Visit: Allegations Section The report alleges that: There are concerns that: The playground mulch is less than the required depth. Currently there is no one on staff who has received the required playground safety training. Some areas of fencing in the playground area are in need of repair. Findings: -Allegation regarding the playground mulch is less than the required depth. I monitored (4) four (OLE) outdoor learning environments, during today’s visit. The allegation stated the playground mulch is less than the required depth. According to Child Care Rule 10A NCAC 09 .0605 OUTDOOR LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN CHILD CARE CENTERS (j) All stationary outdoor equipment more than 18 inches high shall be installed over protective surfacing. Footings which anchor equipment shall not be exposed. Protective surfacing shall be either: loose surfacing material, including wood mulch, double shredded bark mulch, uniform wood chips, fine sand, coarse sand, and pea gravel; other materials that have been certified by the manufacturer to be shock-absorbing protective material in accordance with the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard F 1292 (k) The depth of the loose surfacing material shall be based on the critical height of the equipment, which is defined as the maximum height that a child may sit, or stand, as follows: (1) equipment with a critical height of 5 feet or less shall have 6 inches of loose surface materials; (2) equipment with a critical height of more than 5 feet, but less than 7 feet, shall have 6 inches of loose surfacing material, except for sand; (3) equipment with a critical height of 7 feet to 10 feet shall have 9 inches of any of the loose surfacing material, except for sand; and (4) when sand is used as a surfacing material for equipment with a critical height of more than 5 feet, 12 inches shall be required. The facility currently has two climbing monkey bars on the older preschool playground and the school age playground. Both areas underneath the critical height was measured and they were measured at 6 inches deep. The area was a little compacted but my measuring device was able to capture the 6 inches of required surfacing. I recommend raking mulch before the children play and afterwards to make sure the program has more than enough surfacing underneath the areas. Based on the findings and the Child Care Rule regarding OLE requirements, regarding the allegation, the playground mulch is less than the required depth is deemed unsubstantiated. -Allegation regarding currently there is no one on staff who has received the required playground safety training. The facility is currently under a new owner. New Administrator have 6 months to obtain the required playground training prior to the facility’s expiration date of September 1, 2023. Based on information the allegation is deemed unsubstantiated. -Allegation regarding some areas of fencing in the playground area are in need of repair. I monitored the outdoor learning environment fence area and did not observe areas of the fence needing repairs. The fence measured at exactly 4 feet on the front gate and around the perimeter of the fence did not pose any safety concerns. I provided technical assistance on making sure when the administrator conducts their monthly check to keep an eye on the outer lock near the front gate and around the side of building 2 fence area. Based on my observation during today’s visit, the interview from the administrator, it is deemed unsubstantiated. Technical assistance: We discussed during the walk through that the (6) cans of gallon paint I observed in a room in building 1 was not behind a locked closet. Ms. Funderburk indicated that they just brought the paint in and because the room is not being utilized, they didn’t closed and locked the door. All items with more than 2 warnings should be placed behind a locked door. One violation were observed today. Violation Number Comment Rule 840 All corrosive agents, pesticides, bleaches, detergents, cleansers, polishes, any product which is under pressure in an aerosol dispenser, and any substance which may be hazardous to a child if ingested, inhaled, or handled were not stored in a locked room or cabinet. I observed 6 gallon size cans of paint in an unused childcare room that wasn't locked during today's visit. .2820(b) Note: The administrator stated that on Monday, July 10, 2023, a previous employee that worked under the previous owners became upset that the new owners did not have enough work for him to become employed under their new ownership. He became upset and threated to call STATE to indicate he was the only one who had playground safety training and cared for the outdoor learning environment. It is important for licensed providers to be knowledgeable of all of the licensing requirements that apply to their type of program. Childcare consultants can make unannounced visits at any time. It's the provider's responsibility to be in compliance with all of the applicable laws and rules. Feel free to contact me for assistance at either my office 704-776-0602 or my e-mail Rasheka.Wheeler@dhhs.nc.gov. Rasheka Wheeler Lead Child Care Consultant Regulatory Services Section/DHHS Division of Child Development and Early Education Post Office Box P.O. Box 691174 Mint Hill, NC 28227 If the operator fails to correct any documented violations within the established time period, the Division of Child Development and Early Education may deny, suspend, terminate, or revoke any permit to operate (10A NCAC 09 .2000). All information in this report has been reviewed with me today.I understand that it is my responsibility to maintaincompliance with applicable NC Child Care Requirements at all times

Open Not marked corrected in the state record

Category: ratio. Open / not marked corrected.