Home MI Saginaw Jerome SISD Saginaw County Head Start

Jerome SISD Saginaw County Head Start

1515 Sweet, Saginaw MI 48602 · License #DC730364159 · Center

Active
Capacity 264 childrenLast inspected Feb 17, 2026
Are you the owner of Jerome SISD Saginaw County Head Start?

Claim this profile to add your website, a description, and keep hours & contact details current.

Sign up to claim

Contact

Website
Add via profile claim
Address
1515 Sweet, Saginaw MI 48602 · Directions

Hours

MonClosed
TueClosed
WedClosed
ThuClosed
FriClosed
SatClosed
SunClosed

Care & schedule

When they operate

Center

Ages served

GSRPTransportationPre-schoolInfant/ToddlerHead StartFood Service
  • Licensed for 264 children
5
Violations, past 3 yrs
From inspections (not complaints)
0
High-risk violations
Serious / high-risk non-compliance
0
Substantiated complaints
Published by Michigan MiLEAP
3
Inspections, past 3 yrs
Monitoring & assessments

How this facility compares

Violations per inspection, 3-yr
This facility
1.7
Michigan average
1.8

Inspection history & violations

Source: Michigan MiLEAP, Child Care Licensing Bureau
Jan 4, 2024 — Interim
No violations cited · view state record
Clean
Dec 20, 2022 — Special Investigation
4 violations cited · view state record
4 violations
Feb 4, 2022 — Special Investigation
1 violation cited · view state record
1 violation
  • Violation

    R 400.8140 · R 400.8140 Discipline. (2) All of the following means of punishment are prohibited: (a) Hitting, spanking, shaking, biting, pinching, or inflicting other forms of corporal punishment.

    On 2/4/2022 I conducted an onsite visit at Jerome Head Start Program Director Mindy Dole was spoken with regarding the incident. She provided a copy of the incident report and copies of the child information cards for Child A's classroom. She said on the day of the alleged incident, she noticed Child A in the hallways without a mask on and assisted him. Child A's mother then showed Ms. Dole a small bruise on Child A's chin. The child's teachers Child Care Staff Member 1 (CCSM1) and Child Care Staff Member 2 (CCSM2) were spoken with, and they reported Child A had bumped his chin on a door handle when he was coming in from a fire drill that had occurred that day. He was comforted by staff and seemed fine. There was no mark initially, but the bruise could have developed under his mask as the day progressed. The staff were 2 directed to fill out an incident report. Child A's mother was upset that she was not called but was told there was no mark and Child A seemed fine. The next week, Child A's mother said she did not think the bruise came from the door. Child A's mother requested Child A be moved from the class because she was uncomfortable with the staff in Child A's classroom. Child A was removed from the classroom and placed in a different room. There is a video camera in the entryway where Child A bumped into the door. The footage is in the process of being retrieved. Ms. Dole is unsure if the camera is operational. There have been no prior issues with Child A who has attended since . CCSM2 has worked for the licensee for more than fcivuer ryeenatlry*an as no previous issues or concerns noted in his past. He has only been in the classroom for a couple of weeks. CCSM2 was spoken with. He has worked for the " for a number of years but is new to the Jerome site since eis ware of the incident involving Child A. Child A was coming in from the fire drill. He was just ahead of Child A walking backwards so he could see the children in his class walking in a straight line. CCSM2 stepped to the side and as Child A continued walking, he was looking up at the children going upstairs and bumped his chin on the push bar of the entryway door. Child A started to cry. He stopped to comfort Child A and after a minute, Child A was fine. He checked on Child A throughout the day but saw nothing that concerned him and saw no differences in Child A's behavior. CCSM2 liked Child A and could not think of any other negative issues or incidents with him. At the end of the day Child A's mother was upset that she was not called. The conversation with Child A's mother got heated and he walked away. He knows Child A bumped his chin because he saw it happen. CCSM1 was spoken with. She confirmed that Child A bumped in to a door the day of the fire drill. CCSM2 was leading the children inside. The alarm was still going and the entryway was loud and chaotic. She heard Child A cry out loudly and looked to the front of the line and saw CCSM2 going over to Child A to comfort him. CCSM2 reported to her that Child A bumped into the push bar on the entryway door. She guessed that Child A was looking up at the kids going up the stairs and bumped the door handle with his chin. No mark was noticed throughout the day, but the kids wear masks so she would have only seen his face at limited times. Child A's mother came in that afternoon upset and pointed out the small mark on Child A's chin. Child A never complained or indicated he was uncomfortable. Child A's mother did not appear to like CCSM2 from the start. His conversation with Child A's mother did not go well so the decision was made to switch Child A's classroom. CCSM2 is great with kids, and he is a great male role model for the children in her classroom. He is gentle and caring with the children and would never hit, kick, or play roughly with the children. On 2/16/2022 an email was received from 3 On 2/24/2022 telephone calls were made to Child H and Child I's mother and to Child L's mother. CCSM2 is wonderful wi

    View state record

Questions to ask on your tour

Generated from this facility's specific inspection record

  1. 1The Feb 17, 2026 inspection noted: “During the onsite inspection Room 102 and Room 103 did not have handwashing signs posted by the handwashing sinks, as required.” — what has changed since then?
  2. 2The Dec 19, 2025 inspection noted: “CONCLUSION: REQUIREMENT MET Rule/Statutory Violations” — what has changed since then?
  3. 3The Dec 20, 2022 inspection noted: “On 12/20/2022 upon assignment of the intake, I initiated the special investigation with an onsite inspection at the facility. I met with program director (PD),…” — what has changed since then?

Data synced from Michigan MiLEAP, Child Care Licensing Bureau · Source records · Report an error