Loading
Loading facility…
Pulling inspections, violations, and complaints.
Loading
Pulling inspections, violations, and complaints.
Home › MI › Hillsdale › Katherine And Kevin Robinson
Hillsdale MI 49242 · License #DG300277934 · Home-based · Group Home
Not published by the state. Owners can add hours via profile claim.
When they operate
Ages served
Ages not published.
R 400.1911 · R 400.1911 Care; supervision; children. (1) A licensee shall ensure appropriate care and supervision of children at all times.
On 7128120231 completed an onsite inspection and interview with child care staff member 1 (CCSM I' and said he spoke to Child A's mother on the phone and earne that a an allergic reaction to eating peanut butter crackers despite all child care staff members knowing Child A is allergic to peanut butter. CCSM I reported that licensee Katherine Robinson was currently not home due to taking a family member to a doctor's appointment. CCSM 1 reported that last week she (CCSM 1) was providing the children with crackers for snack time. The snack was a variety of flavors of crackers wrapped in individual packages. She did not realize one of the flavors was peanut butter. She put the packages of crackers on the table for the children to choose which package they wanted, and Child A (who can not read) happened to pick the crackers that had peanut butter in them and Child A is allergic to peanut butter. She said that shortly after eating a few bites of the crackers Child A threw up a small amount and said "I don't like peanut butter at this point, CCSM 1 realized what had happened and informed Katherine Robinson that Child A had crackers with peanut butter in them, Katherine Robinson then called Child A's mother and they were told to monitor him for signs before administering the EpiPen. Child A's mother said the Epipen should only be administered if Child A has breathing issues. CCSM 1 reported that a little while later Child A's mother came and picked him up. He was not exhibiting signs of reaction at the time Child A's mother arrived. They sat and talked monitoring Child A for a while and then she took Child A home. I checked Child A's child information card, and the card indicated that Child A had a peanut allergy. On 7/28/2023 1 completed an interview with Child A's mother with Child A'.s mother reported that Child A has had some allergy issues over t e last several months and they are working through allergy doctors and having Child A tested to keep the information as accurate as possible for all who care for Child A. She reported that she feels Katherine Robinson had not taken Child A's allergy's seriously because of how frequently the allergies have changed as some have been taken away and others have been added. She reported that on 7/24/2023 she received a phone call from Katherine Robinson saying that Child A was fine but had ate crackers with peanut butter on accident. She went right to the child care home to pick Child A up. Katherine Robinson told her that Child A had thrown up a little bit but other than that Child A was fine and playing with blocks. She said they left the child care home and Child A was really thirsty so she stopped at a gas station to buy Child A something to drink. When they were done in the gas station, she noticed that Child A was starting to develop a rash around his mouth and cheeks/forehead areas. She called Child A's doctor who told her not to give the EpiPen unless Child A starts to struggle to breath. She said that she monitored him the remainder of the day and evening and Child A broke out into hives on his face, stomach and arms that were itchy and raised on his skin, and he slept for four hours which is typical of an allergic reaction. Child A's mother had concerns for how this could happen when she had been updating the child information card to include all allergies, they had identified through allergy tests thus far. Child A's mother reported that she has enrolled Child A in a local preschool which was planned before this incident and will not be returning Child A to the child care home. On 7/31/2023 I completed another onsite inspection and interview with licensee Katherine Robinson with Katherine Robinson reported that Child A came into her child care home earlier this year and has had a lot of allergy changes but she recognizes that this is not an excuse for what happened. Katherine Robinson reported that she has had a staff meeting with CCSM 1 and a new staff member that just started to
Appropriate care was not provided when Child A was given a food that contained a food allergen. Appropriate supervision was not provided when Child B choked on Child A's hair beads.
Disposition: Substantiated
Generated from this facility's specific inspection record
Data synced from Michigan MiLEAP, Child Care Licensing Bureau on Jul 9, 2026 · Source records · Report an error
Open Not marked corrected in the state record
Category: supervision. Open / not marked corrected.
R400.1911 · 1 R400.1911 Care; supervision; children. (1) A licensee shall ensure appropriate care and supervision of children at all times.
During my interview with CCSM 1 she reported that she knows Katherine Robinson asked Child A's mom not to bring him with beads in his hair because Child B pulled a bead out and put it in her mouth. CCSM 1 said this happened about two weeks ago. She witnessed Child B put something in her mouth and since Child B is a toddler she went over and looked to see what it was. She put her finger in Child B's mouth and discovered the bead. CCSM 1 said Child B was not choking on the bead. CCSM 1 did not see how the bead got into Child B's hand, so she asked Child A how Child B got the bead and Child A told her that Child B had pulled it out of his hair. Katherine Robinson reported that CCSM 1 informed her a couple of weeks ago that Child B had pulled a bead out of Child A's hair and then had the bead in her mouth. Katherine Robinson said when she addressed this with Child A's mother, she informed her that Child B had put a bead in her mouth, and they can't take the risk of this happening again. Katherine Robinson reported that Child A's mother said there is no way Child B could have pulled the bead out because they are too tight, and Katherine Robinson said maybe Child A pulled it out himself. Child A's mother disagreed with this also, but they made a plan to have Child A wear a cap to cover his beads while at the child care home to help protect the smaller children from having access to them. Katherine Robinson reported she did not fill out an incident report to inform Child B's mother about the bead because there was no incident. Child B did not choke, and it is common for children Child B's age to put things in their mouth which is why CCSM 1 checked when she saw her put her hand to her mouth. Child A's mother reported that about two weeks ago Katherine Robinson told her a child had choked on a bead that was pulled from Child A's head and therefore, Child A can't wear beads anymore. This concerned her that the children were not being supervised if a child was able to choke on a bead. Child A's mother felt this was 5 discriminating against Child A because he is of mixed racial ethnicity. They came up with a plan to have Child A come to the child care home wearing a skull cap. Child A's mother reported that she double bands the beads in so she does not feel that Child A or Child B could have pulled the beads out. Child B's mother reported that she was not made aware that Child B had put a bead in her mouth but given her developmental age, this is to be expected. She would not expect Katherine Robinson to inform her every time Child B put something in her mouth. She had no concerns with supervision and no other concerns to bring to the department's attention. Child C's mother reported that she has never had any concerns with supervision and Child C enjoys attending the child care home. On 8/17/2023 I completed a case conference with will be closed. On 8/18/2023 I completed an exit conference with Katherine Robinson.
Open Not marked corrected in the state record
Category: supervision. Open / not marked corrected.
R4001913 Discipline; child handling. (2) Developmentally appropriate positive methods of discipline that encourage self-control, self-direction, self-esteem, and cooperation must be used.
Developmentally appropriate discipline was not used when Child A was made to sit in timeout until calm resulting in Child A being in timeout longer than one minute per age. ...................
Open Not marked corrected in the state record
Category: ratio. Open / not marked corrected.
R400.1913 · ............... .................. R400.1913 Discipline; child handling. (3) Personnel shall not do any of the following: (d) Inflict mental or emotional stress, such as humiliating, shaming, threatening a child, or using derogatory remarks.
Developmentally appropriate discipline was not used when CCSM 1 admitted to using a threat of a parent to come spank the children if they do not behave.
Open Not marked corrected in the state record
Category: recordkeeping. Open / not marked corrected.