Loading facility…

Pulling inspections, violations, and complaints.

Heinz, Sarah Family Child Care home daycare inspections in San Diego, CA — KinderFax

Home › CA › San Diego › Heinz, Sarah Family Child Care

Heinz, Sarah Family Child Care

San Diego CA 92123 · License #376627847 · Home-based · Family Day Care Home

LICENSED

Capacity 14 childrenLast inspected Mar 18, 2024

Website: Add via profile claim
Address: San Diego CA 92123 · Directions
Privacy: Street address withheld for home-based providers. Request suppression

Not published by the state. Owners can add hours via profile claim.

When they operate

Family Day Care Home

Ages served

960 - CHILDREN / INFANT

Violations, past 3 yrs

From inspections (not complaints)

High-risk violations

Serious / high-risk non-compliance

Substantiated complaints

Published by California CCLD

Inspections, past 3 yrs

Monitoring & assessments

Violations per inspection, 3-yr

This facility

1.0

California average

0.4

Source: California DSS, Community Care Licensing Division

Mar 18, 2024 — Annual/Random

1 violation cited · view state record

1 violation

Type A
102370(k) · Criminal Record Clearance (k) The licensee shall maintain documentation of criminal record clearances or criminal record exemptions of employees, volunteers that require fingerprinting and non-client adults residing in the facility.
Deficient Practice Statement Based on record review and Licensee statement, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one out of two helpers (S1), which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. POC Due Date: 03/19/2024
Open Not marked corrected in the state record
Category: background checks. Open / not marked corrected.

Nov 19, 2021 — Required - 1 Year

No violations cited · view state record

Clean

Generated from this facility's specific inspection record

1The Mar 18, 2024 inspection noted: “Deficient Practice Statement Based on record review and Licensee statement, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in one out of two helpers (…” — what has changed since then?